We represented Mr. Vishnu Gupta in a Bail Matter who was alleged to be Director of “Anee Bullion Group of Companies” |14083|

Download PDF

Case Brief


Case Title : Vishnu Gupta vs State of U.P. 

Case No. : 14083/2023 (BAIL)

Decided On / Result : 30.11.2023 

Quorum : Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.



Brief Facts of the Case – 

                In this Matter, FIR No. 451 lodged on 02/07/2020 at Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya against 7 persons in which the company took the amount of Rs. 21,79,000 from the victim and their family members under the allurement of lucrative return by showing forge document and ids's to gain their trust.


Few facts that went against our client – 

                Some facts were very unfavourable to our client Like –

  1. This matter was being investigated by the Enforcement Directorate (E.D.) & Economic offences Wing (E.O.W.)

  2. Media & People were claiming that in this matter a Scam of about 1000 Cr. has been done by the said Company.

  3. Applicant was having the Criminal History of 54 Cases.

  4. Applicant was the real brother of Director Ajeet Kumar Gupta who was the director of “Anee Bullion Group of Companies”

  5. Gangster Act was also imposed on the applicant.

              


Applicant was Challenged Under Sections – 

  1. 420 IPC  – Cheating / Punishable upto 7 years of Imprisonment / Non – Bailable 

  2. 406 IPC  – Criminal Breach of Trust/ Punishable upto 3 years of Imprisonment, a fine or Both / Non Bailable

  3. 467 IPC  – Forgery / Punishable upto 10 years or life Imprisonment / Non – Bailable

  4. 468 IPC  – Forgery for the purpose of Cheating / Punishable upto 7 years and fine /  Non Bailable

  5. 471 IPC  – Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record / Punishable upto 7 years of Imprisonment /  Bailable

  6. 409 IPC – Criminal Breach of Trust by Public Servant, or by banker, merchant or agent / Imprisonment upto 10 years along with a fine / Non - Bailable

 


Our Submissions and Court’s finding in favour of our client / Conclusion  – 

We gave our best while arguing for our client. Later on Hon’ble court considered the aforesaid facts that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case for the reason that he is elder brother of the co-accused Ajit Kumar, who is Director of the aforesaid company and the applicant has already been granted bail in the present case and merely Section 409 IPC has been added on the same set of allegations. Therefore, the Hon'ble Court granted bail to the applicant.